forums Home Forums Start Page Forums Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Member List Members List
Go Back   Petri IT Knowledgebase Forums > Server Operating Systems > Windows Server 2008 / 2008 R2 is happy to award RicklesP the title of Most Valuable Member !!!
Register Calendar Calendar Search Petri IT Knowledgebase Forums Search Todays Posts Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Server 2008 - Which Processor

Server 2008 - Which Processor

this thread has 0 replies and has been viewed 1117 times

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd July 2011, 03:27
HotDay2222 HotDay2222 is offline
Junior Member
It's not a coincidence
 Join Date: Jun 2008
  6 month star 12 month star
 Posts: 142
 Reputation: HotDay2222 is on a distinguished road (44)
Default Server 2008 - Which Processor

At the risk of starting an Intel v. AMD war, I humbly ask with trepidation which of these two processors would be better for a small server that I want to build:

AMD Athlon II X4 610e VS. Intel Core i3-2100T Sandy Bridge

The system will run Windows 2008 server where 3 users will log on locally and instead of closing applications and logging off, they and leave their applications running and switch users. Once in a while one of the users will log on via Remote Desktop Connection within the network.

The system will be used for business purposes and applications. Users will use Word (multiple instances ), Excel (multiple instances ), some Powerpoint, internet browsing (sometimes used for google maps), PDF viewing, and very infrequently some picture viewing. This is not a gaming PC or photo editing PC. Simple boring business PC that needs to handle multiple Words, Excels, and some Powerpoints and PDFs running at the same time.

I was read online that more cores is better when running multiple applications (as this system will) but then I read somewhere else that after 2 cores (which is what intel has) the performance of more cores (which is what AMD has - 4) diminishes. So, I like AMDs more cores but Intel's power consumption is 35W, while AMDs is 45W.
Low power consumption is the philosophy I'm taking with this system because it will always be on. So, I limited my selection to these two processors because they are the most powerful processors I can find in the low power consumption range.

The proposed system will have:
2x4GB Kingston DDR3 SDRAM 1333

1x60GB Solid State Harddrive where Operating System will be installed

2x500GB WD Harddrives set up with Mirror Raid for file storage
No video card-I'll get mobo with onboard video.

If anyone has any suggestions they think might improve my system it'll be greatly appreciated. Again, main idea is reduce power consumption while still being able to do basic business work - Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, internet browsing.

Again, thank you.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IIS 7.5 + sql server 2008 + windows server 2008 web edition dontknow Windows Server 2008 / 2008 R2 0 28th May 2010 11:05
Multi-processor license on Server 2003 standard? RobW Windows Server 2000 / 2003 / 2003 R2 3 29th October 2007 11:34
Will one processor do it? tnshurtm VMware Virtualization 8 27th February 2007 18:51
Processor Revision Stonelaughter Misc 2 1st December 2006 21:47
Multi processor does not detected in windows 2000 server skm_mail Windows Server 2000 / 2003 / 2003 R2 1 18th January 2005 11:29

All times are GMT +3. The time now is 01:33.

Steel Blue 3.5.4 vBulletin Style ©2006 vBEnhanced
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Valid XHTML 1.0!   Valid CSS!

Copyright 2005 Daniel Petri